On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 17:17 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Looking at the code again and the alleged fix for the Couchdb problem I > see that the fix can't have the desired effect. It did reorder the > databases as desired, but picking the default one is done differently. > I've reopened 7877. Sorry for that!
A (working!) fix should be in 1.0 beta 2. This time, I actually ran some tests with a default configuration on an Ubuntu chroot and that worked. With 1.0 beta being a viable alternative for 0.9.2, I'd rather not do a 0.9.3 update. Is that okay? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
