On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 09:45 +0000, Zhu, Yongsheng wrote:
> > Currently we only have --enable-dbus-service, which enables *building*
> > syncevo-dbus-server. Should we enable support for *using* it with that
> > same option? I think I prefer to keep it simple and use just one option.
> You mean use '--enable-dbus-service [yes/no]' in the command line option? Yes,
> I think it's a good suggestion. It means 'enabling dbus service usage in the
> command
> line'.
No, I think we should expand its scope to
--enable-dbus-service enables building syncevo-dbus-server and all
related features (D-Bus wrapper library,
command line usage of server, ...)
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
