On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 12:48 +0100, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > > The exception is that these updates really have to be infrequent > enough > > to be barely noticable (IMHO every 5 minutes would be okay). The > > question to the consumers of such an event then becomes: is this too > > coarse to be useful? > > > > Jussi, what do you think? > > No, that's not too coarse. An even more silent option is: > * GetAutosyncStatus() method that returns next estimated sync time > and possible reason/status > * AutosyncStatusChanged-signal that is fired when estimated time or > reason/status changes. > > Is there a problem with something like this?
No, I don't think so. Feature request for future versions, so let's track it: http://bugzilla.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=535 "syncevo-dbus-server: notify clients about automatic sync schedule" -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
