On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:48 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Firstly syncevolution doesn't compile against the latest evolution
>> 2.31.x releases. I believe this is due to some changes in libcamel in
>> preparation for evolution 3.0.
>
> SyncEvolution doesn't include anything from libcamel. Can you quote an
> error message?

Actually on closer look it might be changes in gtk and not evolution.
My bad, sorry.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2210957&name=build.log

>> On Fedora 13 we're seeing a fairly regular crash in dbus_error_is_set
>> [1], I've had about a dozen or so reports on that so far.
>
> This is the code:
>
> DBusConnection *g_dbus_setup_bus(DBusBusType type, const char *name,
>                                                        gboolean unshared,
>                                                        DBusError *error)
> {
>        DBusConnection *connection;
>
>        DBG("type %d name %s error %p", type, name, error);
>
>
>        connection = unshared ? dbus_bus_get_private(type, error) :
>                dbus_bus_get(type, error);
>
>        if (error != NULL) {
>                if (dbus_error_is_set(error) == TRUE)
>                        return NULL;
>        }
>
> Looks to me like dbus_get_private() (which is what SyncEvolution uses)
> does not set a proper error pointer. valgrind should tell us more. Note
> that the mainloop.c:458 line does not quite match the source - confused
> debug information?
>
> Can you follow up to this? I don't have a FC 13 installation at hand.

I'll do so as best as I can. The following crash dumps look to be the
most complete. If they don't have what's needed I'll look at what I
can do to get you a more complete one.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=418008
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=418102
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=418228

Peter
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to