On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 22:12 +0100, Frederik Elwert wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 08.06.2010, 19:40 +0200 schrieb Patrick Ohly: > > Together with Yongsheng I've updated the documentation in D-Bus > > specification .xml files and added makefile rules to produce an .html. A > > preview which (except for the version number) should be identical to the > > 1.0 release is here: > > http://api.syncevolution.org/ > > > > How does that look? > > I don’t know if my opinion is of interest, or if it’s too late already, > but anyway: I just saw that there is now a TemplatesChanged signal for > the Server. Maybe it would make sense to add a ConfigsChanged signal?
It's too late for 1.0, but it definitely makes sense to add it. Let me reply in more detail to your other email. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
