On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 19:39 +0100, h2oz7v wrote: > This might sound like an obvious question, but can I build > syncEvolution without install Evolution itself?
Yes. The configure script defaults to building with Evolution and complains if the development files are not found, but using --disable-ebook --disable-ecal will tell it to proceed anyway. > I don't use Evolution, rather Thunderbird and am interested in > syncEvolution for its synching directly over Bluetooth. I would then > synch via Fundambol and its corresponding TB extension. I don't quite see how SyncEvolution gets involved here. Do you mean that you'll sync TB<->Funambol<->SyncEvolution<->phone? That's possible, but wouldn't it be easier to sync Funambol and the phone directly? Or use SyncEvolution as local SyncML server and sync TB<->SyncEvolution<->phone. In both case you can use the local file backend in SyncEvolution to store data. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
