On Fr, 2010-11-05 at 12:26 +0000, Nils Faerber wrote: > I now use something like: > deviceId = sc-api-nat-<identifier> > which you proposed earlier on the SyncEvo Wiki: > http://syncevolution.org/wiki/Horde > (I should have read that earlier!). > > > commit 185a33d3415a6156c9bcf7ee120566aa9b91983a > > Author: Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> > > Date: Fri Feb 19 16:13:43 2010 +0100 > > > > deviceId: use syncevolution- prefix, helps Horde (MB #9347) > > Hmm... would that make a diference in contrast to sc-api-nat-... ?
No, I don't think so. As long as Horde does not mistake us for a old Funambol client, everything should be fine. However, I'm only guessing. The Horde developers would know for sure. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
