On Mi, 2010-12-22 at 21:31 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> On 22/12/10 21:41, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > How strongly do you feel about the added description? I'd rather keep
> > the code as it is instead of risking breaking something for someone
> > else.
> (I posted a reply to this earlier, but it seems to have disappeared into
> a cyber-black hole.)
>
> The issue is not important enough to warrant turning everything upside
> down, and maybe causing problems for other people.
You have a valid point. It might not be a big issue, but even the small
ones matter.
> I've made the changes to the xml file, as you suggested, and it's now
> doing what I want. If I can do that in future versions, I'm OK.
With Lukas explanation I'd be comfortable to make the change for
everyone.
Can you confirm that the line that he suggested works for you, instead
of removing it entirely?
if (ISAVAILABLE(SUMMARY)!=TRUE && DESCRIPTION==EMPTY)
DESCRIPTION=SUMMARY;
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
