On So, 2010-12-26 at 07:31 +0000, Giancarlo wrote:
> Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@...> writes:
>
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > As usual, I'd like to write down some thoughts on future functionality
> > before actually implement it.
>
> May I suggest also some way to have an encrypted channel, either through
> https
> or ssh?
Right, forgot about those. ssh would require changes in SyncEvolution,
but would be doable. https probably has more advantages.
Additional option:
--server-certificate=<file> certificate used by the server to identify
itself (TODO: details about file content)
I'm not planning to support client certificate checking, at least not
initially.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
