On Sa, 2011-01-08 at 12:36 +0000, Emanoil Kotsev wrote: [...] > I don't agree that my work on the akonadi plugin for opensync was in > vain.
My apologies if that sounded a bit harsh. My view point is that of a user: which use cases does it satisfy? Can it be installed without too much trouble? Is it production-quality? These are the goals that I have with the stable SyncEvolution releases. > But this is not the point here. As I couldn't find any useful code to > check KDE capability in SyncEvo I asked (AFAIR) but nothing happened. > You've just send me the link that did not have any downloadable > information. There are no binaries with Akonadi support, if that's what you were looking for. It is too early for that. http://saidinesh5.wordpress.com/2010/08/24/are-we-there-yet/ points towards the source code repository where Dinesh does his work: http://gitorious.org/~saidinesh5/meego-middleware/saidinesh5-syncevolution The HACKING document contains some general hints about compiling SyncEvolution and Dinesh describes specific steps for the Akonadi support in his blog post. So if you have time, I suggest that you give compiling it a try, then try it out and work with Dinesh to address any of the known (or unknown) gaps. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
