On Sa, 2011-01-08 at 13:12 +0000, Emanoil Kotsev wrote: > > Are you interested in any help with this that does not > > involve signing > > a contributor agreement? > > > > Licensing of synthesis was also my consideration. Interesting to know > how Patrick has solved it into his project. I don't remember if I had > to sign a license agreement when running syncevo the first time
You get the source code under the normal LGPL, so no need to sign anything to use, modify, or distribute the code. It is only if you want to have your patches included by Lukas in the upstream version of libsynthesis that a contributor agreement becomes necessary. Lukas has explained the reasoning in his other email. All developers committing code into the libsynthesis repo in meego.gitorious.org (the repo which is used for SyncEvolution) have signed this agreement, so even though that repo sometimes contains patches not yet merged back by Lukas, that is only temporary. It definitely is not meant to be a permanent fork. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
