On Fr, 2011-07-15 at 13:12 +0100, Andy Gould wrote:
> On 15/07/11 12:58, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Fr, 2011-07-15 at 12:44 +0100, Andy Gould wrote:
> >> On 15/07/11 11:42, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> >>> On Fr, 2011-07-15 at 11:21 +0100, Andy Gould wrote:
> >> Hi Patrick,
> >>    I may have misunderstood the point of the 2 activsyncd accounts ( Foo,
> >> and Foo_B in gconf) - can you clarify for me.... should they point to
> >> different Exchange accounts ( [email protected] and
> >> [email protected]) - or the same one?
> > The same one, but with different device IDs.
> >
> > So if you configure target-config@client-test with username=Foo, then
> > you need accounts called "Foo" and "Foo_B" in gconf. Both must have the
> > same username/password/URL. But because they are different local
> > accounts, my expectation is that activesyncd treats them completely
> > separate and thus assigns different device IDs. To the Exchange servers
> > this should look like two devices who happen to contact it with the same
> > IP address.
> >
> yeah, thats what I thought  unfortunately, your assumption about the way 
> that the accounts are handled was not correct.  At the moment, the 
> device id is exactly that - fixed for the device, so I needed to 
> allocate account level ids instead, I have done that - but they are not 
> being used, because the daemon is too clever for its own good - and 
> recognises that the 2nd account is actually pointing at the same 
> Exchange account, and grabs the existing connection for it. One more 
> modification, and hopefully that will sort it.... getting there slowly.

How has this been resolved? Is it necessary to manually request real
unique device IDs in gconf for the second Foo_B account?

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to