On Mi, 2011-07-27 at 01:45 +0200, Chris Kühl wrote: > I've tried my dbus-server-reorg branch with this change as well as > your dbus-server-reorg-pohly-libsynccommon branch but I still get the > same results as before.
Just to be sure, you mean the "no backends available in static compilation" problem? The last commit fixed it for me. Anyway, the little benefit of compiling the source files less often is not worth the hassle. I'll revert to including the core source files in all executables. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
