On Do, 2011-07-28 at 12:52 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 12:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Do, 2011-07-28 at 12:16 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > Thanks. And are those .rpm files meant for use with Fedora, Red Hat, or > > > SuSe, or all of them? > > > > All. I try to avoid depending on system specific aspects as much as > > possible. Same with the .debs - they should work on Debian and > > derivatives. > > > > The downside is that the packaging certainly doesn't live up to distro > > standards. > > Thanks. I have restructured this page a little to make that all clearer: > http://syncevolution.org/documentation/installation > > But is there any reason that we shouldn't recommend the distro's own > packages (and link to their status pages) unless the user wants the very > latest version?
You are right, the distro's own packages are certainly recommended, if recent enough. But often they aren't as new as the latest upstream release. I've moved the files inside /syncevolution/evolution/ as discussed earlier. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
