On So, 2011-07-31 at 06:53 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote: > If someone ever writes a SQLite calendar backend for SyncEvolution, then > making it compatible with this schema might be useful. (Of course, for > this use case, making a GPE backend using the GPE libraries might be > another option, but who knows which backend is more likely to happen...)
That all depends on the person picking up that task. Technically both might make sense. [GPE sqlite schema deleted] The challenge when talking to sqlite directly is to get the semantic right. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
