On Mi, 2011-08-31 at 15:42 +0100, Andy Gould wrote: > On 31/08/2011 14:32, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > Isn't the TZNAME property of the STANDARD and DAYLIGHT subcomponent a > > better match for the StandardName and DaylightName? > possibly - I didn't write this code, so I'm looking at it for the first > time...I'm not sure if Exchange actually stores it, properly anyway - I > think it ends up putting its own strings in there, so not sure if it > actually makes that much difference... might be worht running a couple > of tests
Indeed, it doesn't seem to matter much. Still, the code should be correct or get removed if not needed. One more question: I assume that g_utf8_to_utf16()/gunichar2 use the native byte ordering. What byte order does ActiveSync specify? We seem to lack byte-swapping. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
