On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 15:07 +0000, stephan wrote: > Sorry for my late reply. Yes, it definitely makes more sense and I think > it's a > great improvement of the documentation. I've read through it and I really > have a > better picture of how things work now. I'm looking forward to tweak my > configuration of syncevolution a bit ;-) Maybe I come back with some questions > later - but I think most of it has been clearified. Thank you!
Thanks for the feedback. I'm glad it passed muster. I've merged it into the SyncEvolution 1.2 maintenance and the master branches. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
