On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:30 +0100, Alain Knaff wrote: > On 02/11/11 09:07, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 23:15 +0100, Alain Knaff wrote: > >> On 2011-11-01 20:24, Patrick Ohly wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:46 +0100, Alain Knaff wrote: > >> [...] > >>>> ltrace also shows that the only environment variable accessed by > >>>> syncevolution is SYNCEVOLUTION_DEBUG > >>> > >>> That's a bit surprising. The 1.2 binaries from syncevolution.org (with > >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> That's probably the reason, I've only got 1.1.99.6-1 on my N900. > > > > Sorry, forget to comment on that. No, 1.1.99.6 is very similar to 1.2 > > and also should check additional environment variables. > > > > Unfortunately, it does not. Does syncevolution itself read those > variables, or do the libraries on which it depends read them?
libsyncevolution.so reads them, at least when building SyncEvolution with shared libraries. Might not be the case on the N900. > Or is it > just ltrace going funny? Perhaps. <shrug> -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
