On Mi, 2011-11-16 at 11:10 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Chris Kühl <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > Ok. We should be close to requesting a merge. Only 2 failures to fix > > before we've reached parity on our machines. > > > > After fixing those remaining issues, we ran the server under valgrind > and fixed up a few memory leaks we found. I've now created a > for-master/gio-gdbus branch, squashed the commits and pushed.
I've started a test run. > I'll now start to work out the plan for running multiple concurrent sessions. I'll start a separate thread where I outline some requirements. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
