On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 14:04 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Does anyone need anything fixed in 1.2.1?
> 
> 1.2 fails to build in F-17. I'm not sure if that's because of the
> glib2 deprecations being turned on or eds changes for 3.3.x (or a
> combination of both). A full build log is here
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3532017&name=build.log
> but I've not had a chance to look at it any closer.

Looks to me like it fails because of including specific glib headers
instead of glib.h. The function deprecation is just a warning.

Can you try replacing all <glib/*.h> include statements with <glib.h>
and provide the patch? Would it be okay to ship 1.2.1 without that
patch? Just trying to find out how important it is.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to