On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 08:57 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> > Any idea what might be necessary to get access to the phone book?
> > There's nothing in the phone's UI to enable it (Android 2.2, HTC
> Sense).
> >
> 
> You probably need to connect HFP first, otherwise some phones might 
> reject the PBAP session. If you're interested, I suggest you try oFono. 
> Just make sure you have "Enable=Gateway" in /etc/bluetooth/audio.conf 
> and then you can use ofono/test/enable-modem to connect HFP. 

Into which section of /etc/bluetooth/audio.conf does the
"Enable=Gateway" belong? My copy of it (4.98-2, Debian testing) doesn't
have "Enable" anywhere and at first glance I have also not found any
documentation about the config files.

The "enable-modem" operations fails for me inside "ofonod -n -d" with 

ofonod[29960]: plugins/hfp_hf.c:hfp_connect_reply() Connect reply: Method 
"Connect" with signature "" on interface "org.bluez.HandsfreeGateway" doesn't 
exist

There is indeed no such interface on org.bluez on the system bus.

I came back to this as part of adapting the PBAP backend to recent
changes on the master branch. Code is in the pbap branch (not rebased,
just pull):

commit 46d7d344f3692c1ec539d5db54ff6944032ac936
Merge: c12cde0 f345038
Author: Patrick Ohly <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Feb 21 14:26:56 2012 +0100

    PBAB: Merge branch 'master' into pbap + D-Bus method calls
    
    The mechanism for making D-Bus method calls changed on the master
    branch. The normal call operator now does a blocking method call,
    which breaks code depending on the former non-blocking semantic.
    
    All D-Bus methods calls in the PBAB backend are now blocking. This
    allows removing all callback methods and the start/stop main loop
    tricks. A lot easier to read and problems while executing the method
    calls are now properly reported back to the user of the backend via
    exceptions.

Beware, my changes are untested because I don't have PBAP access working
here at the moment.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to