Sorry for the late reply, I read this on my phone and then forgot to follow up when back at the computer.
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:16 +0100, Thomas Pequet wrote: > Le 06/03/2012 13:14, Patrick Ohly a écrit : > > Thomas Pequet wrote: > > It's a bit curious that in one case the anchor is a time stamp, in the > > other a number. Both are strings sent by the Memotoo server. Did you > > perhaps change the anchor formatting from "seconds since epoch as time > > stamp" to "seconds since epoch as integer"? I haven't checked whether > > 20120228T115051Z matches 1330608696000 when interpreted like that. > It is strange, Memotoo return only date with seconds (ex: > 1330608696000) not timestamp... So why SyncEvolution store the > timestamp ???? SyncEvolution and libsynthesis treats the sync anchor as string. It should never convert to a time stamp. Does your user still have other logs? He can do a "grep -l -r 20120228T115051Z ~/.cache/syncevolution" to find all relevant log files. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
