On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 11:33 +0100, Krzesimir Nowak wrote: > 2012/3/16 Patrick Ohly <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 13:52 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > > Krzesimir, you can document and rename the callbacks in parallel. Please > > base it on the concurrent-sync-pohly-delayed-dbus branch. > > > > It is in > https://meego.gitorious.org/~krnowak/meego-middleware/krnowaks-syncevolution/commits/concurrent-sync-pohly-delayed-dbus > > I also started refactoring Resources to have: > - clean ownership situation when creating resources, > - resources tracking in signals > - additional callback for case when creating resource failed after > spawning a sync-helper. > > The branch is > https://meego.gitorious.org/~krnowak/meego-middleware/krnowaks-syncevolution/commits/cssr1 > but I recommend not merging that, because I have to investigate why > some session test are now failing. > > I was also thinking that we should use boost::slot instead of > boost::function for callback for tracking purposes. But if that is > needed then it may be done after I am done with the things above.
Thanks for the changes. I'll have a look at them as part of my own code changes. Don't worry about the failing tests for now. The problem might resolve itself as part of the work that I am doing. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
