Thanks, Patrick, for your help.

> As a first step, run the "--sync refresh-from-server" with "loglevel=4",
> to get the actual data dumped into the N9's syncevolution-log.html file.
> Look for a problematic event. Is it in the file?

I have three calendards totaling many hundreds of events (for 2012
only), so I'm shying away from this for now...  But I did something
simpler: I changed the description of an event with summary "Test" on
the laptop, and synced (two-way) with loglevel=4.  The result is in
https://iis.uibk.ac.at/public/piater/syncevo/client_+for_+laptop-2012-07-13-12-15/.
The log contains the following lines:

[2012-07-13 12:15:17.788] cannot update record in database (sta=207)
[2012-07-13 12:15:17.789] Database Error --> SyncML status 207
[2012-07-13 12:15:17.789] - Operation replace failed with SyncML status=207

Might this be related?

The terminal output did not indicate any errors, but the event does not
show on the N9 (neither before nor after the sync).

> The "Generated" text/calendar is what gets passed to the N9's calendar
> backend (KCal). My guess is that the import fails, triggers a bug in the
> backend and/or storage.

My experience tells me that such is probably the case, caused by a bogus
event somewhere, which I may not be able to get around hunting down the
hard way.

> But why did you only update these libs and not the rest of
> SyncEvolution? Are you perhaps on Debian Wheezy, which now has the
> more recent libs but not yet SyncEvolution (currently triggers a
> compiler bug on MIPS and thus is prevented from entering Wheezy)?

Precisely.

> You could rule out this mismatch as the root cause by installing
> 1.2.99.2 from syncevolution.org. Deinstall the system's libsynthesis0,
> libsmltk0 and syncevolution packages if apt[itude] doesn't do it
> automatically.

I was hoping this version would enter sid one of these days, but maybe I
should not hold my breath and install from source.

Thanks,
Justus
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to