On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 13:14 +0200, api984 wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am trying out SyncEvolution. Currently I would try to sync one way
> from Radicale to Google Calendar.
> 
> I read documentation. But its hard to get some examples or more detail
> in docs.

The HOWTO section in the Wiki has more examples:
https://syncevolution.org/wiki/howto

Your specific use case is new, so there is no HOWTO for it.

>  I am trying to sync
> 
> Radicale CALDAV to Google Calendar. Radicale is company local caldav
> server for calendaring and it works pretty well.
[...]
> Sync would look like?:
> 
> Radicale -> Local db (ical)
> 
> Local -> google calendar
> 
>  
> 
> Or it can go directly?

You can also go directly. For that, set up CalDAV target-config@radicale
and target-config@google as described in the man page
(https://syncevolution.org/documentation/syncevolution-usage#caldav-and-carddav)
 and the Radicale entry (https://syncevolution.org/wiki/synchronizing-radicale).

In the case of Radicale you only need one calendar source; make sure
that you use set the "database" property for it.

Then create a local sync config which uses the Radicale side as "local"
storage and Google as target side:
syncevolution --configure --template SyncEvolution_Client \
              syncURL=local://@google-calendar
              sync=two-way \
              uri=calendar \
              google-calendar@radicale calendar

I'm assuming that the source is called "calendar" on both sides. The
"uri=calendar" is redundant in that case.

> I am still learning and reading how to use syncevolution properly.
> 
> I am using SyncEvolution 1.2.2 on Ubuntu 10.04. LTS (workstation).

I recommend updating to 1.2.99.4. Binaries are available from
syncevolution.org.

> PS. Is there any way to install it on Centos 5.2 x64 (server)? 

The rpms from
http://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution/evolution/amd64-rpm/
might work, otherwise compile from source.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to