On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 14:56:03 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: [...]
> I can't give you a list of commits which need to be back-ported. That > would be akin to maintaining a stable branch based on 1.2.99.1. I don't > have the time for that. Hi Patrick, of cause, I'm aware that I'm on my own here. > I also doubt that the result will be really > better than 1.3.2. I think it's better than releasing Wheezy with 1.2.99.1, which has broken sync-ui, broken autosync etc. > This kind of back-porting comes with its own risks. I'm fully aware of that. > Basically you are releasing a version which has not seen any kind of > testing outside of Debian. Good luck ;-} My intention is to provide backports of 1.3.x once Wheezy is released via backports.debian.org and point users to the backport if necessary. Thanks for the pointers to the commits. Regards, Tino _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
