On Mi, 2013-11-20 at 11:23 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > what is the state of the current libsynthesis development? There is > already a libsynthesis_3.4.0.47+syncevolution-1-3-99-6 tag. Is it a > good idea to use that for upcoming syncevolution packages?
It is an *excellent* idea to use the libsynthesis that matches the SyncEvolution release that you are packaging ;-) The reason is that this is what I have tested together. It may also contain API changes that SyncEvolution depends on or fixes for problems reported by SyncEvolution users. However, libsynthesis_3.4.0.47+syncevolution-1-3-99-6 has not been released yet. Consider the tag experimental until the actual tar archive gets published. In fact, the main reason why I haven't published 1.3.99.6 yet is a problem found during release testing which will require one more change in libsynthesis. I am working on it as we speak, eh, write. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
