On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 14:23 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: > Thanks Patrick. > > "It depends on whether the server uses the sent DevInf at all". This > statement helped a lot :) > > You were right!. Funambol is not considering the device capabilities. > I tested by removing the TEL property from client devinf, but still > Funambol did not take this into consideration and as part of the > refresh-from-server, Funambol sent the complete TEL information.
That alone might not be enough to determine whether the info is used. Even if the client does not support a property, the server might still send it, just to be sure, at least when the property is small. A better test looks at how the server reacts when receiving an update where a property is missing that the server currently has: if the client supports the property, the server should remove its copy of the property. If the client doesn't, the server should keep its copy. > I will now try deploying syncevo as a server and try synncing with this. https://syncevolution.org/wiki/http-server-howto -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
