On 17/12/13 07:41, Patrick Ohly wrote: > For ActiveSync there is something, based on keeping a TCP connection to > the server open and having one pending command which the server replies > to when there was a change. However, neither SyncEvolution nor > activesyncd support that because there was no time to implement it.
If the work was done to support the ActiveSync mechanism, would SyncEvolution actually be able to do anything with it? Would the update have to trigger a complete new sync, or could the sync be done incrementally in some way? Graham _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
