On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 14:55 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: > Thanks Patrick. > > Could you please elaborate more on > "but not very useful, because the conversion is not very complete." > > What conversion you are referring to?
The conversion of the internal representation to and from the demo sqlite schema. Several properties are not getting stored. > PS: We have dropped the idea of using MySQL as a backend and plan to > extend sqlite to calenders also. That's certainly a useful programming exercise. I am not sure whether it's suitable for a production system, though, if that's what you intend to achieve. If you need a database as storage instead of EDS or the plain files, then you might also want to look at the sqlite support in libsynthesis. See chapter "12. <server type="sql"/"odbc">, <client type="sql"/"odbc">: SQL/ODBC based Server or Client Config" in libsynthesis/doc/SySync_config_reference.pdf It's probably going to be more complete and better tested. SyncEvolution does not use that mode, it always runs as server or client type='plugin'. It should be possible to change that. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
