On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 09:56 +0100, Ove Kåven wrote: > The SSO implementation on Sailfish, though, is also based on Nokia's SSO > implementation. From what I can tell, this implementation is from > Ubuntu. It seems to me that Sailfish is using the SSO implementation > from Ubuntu Online Accounts.
I'm not sure which one came first, but yes, this is the same solution (libaccounts + libsignon, aka Ubuntu Online Accounts). An alternative implementation is gSSO (forked libsignon with a new, glib-based implementation of the daemon and plugins). > Then, what's the plan for supporting UOA in SyncEvolution? The gSSO that was discussed on this list last year pretty much already covered it. See http://cgit.freedesktop.org/SyncEvolution/syncevolution/tree/src/backends/signon/README Since then Canonical has contributed a patch to make it work with Ubuntu Online Accounts, see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72263 I'll merge that patch soon, it's only blocked by my current work on parallelizing the nightly test system. Well, that, and Christmas/New Year Eve's vacation :-) Regarding Sailfish, you'll probably need to compare docs to find out whether it works exactly as the current Ubuntu Online Accounts. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
