On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 23:44 +0000, Graham Cobb wrote: > I note that Patrick does include activesyncd in his > http://downloads.syncevolution.org/apt repository. I don't know who > maintains that packaging (I am guessing it is Patrick).
I package the files that I get out of the nightly build/testing. It's mostly a quick hack, though, and not something that a distro should adopt. Also note that activesyncd depends on a more recent libwbxml than the one currently found in Linux distros. I'm currently trying out packaging of activesyncd and syncevolution-activesyncd per distro (currently Wheezy, Saucy, Trusty -> activesyncd-wheezy, syncevolution-activesyncd-wheezy, etc.) and the base name just being a meta package which depends on one of the others. That is necessary because each of these distros has seen incompatible changes in EDS (3.4 -> 3.6 -> 3.10) and/or libical (.so.0 -> .so.1). Debian Testing/Unstable would not be covered at the moment. I pinged the libical maintainer and asked him to package libical1; once that is in, the Saucy package (EDS 3.8 + libical1) should work. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
