On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 18:29 +0200, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > > Wouldn't a move to either github pages or github wiki be easiest, > > management-wise? > > Are you suggesting to move just the Wiki pages or all content? > > Either or both. Depends on your preference. > I am looking for a solution where someone else takes over the primary > responsibility for making syncevolution.org useful to users and nice > looking (ideally both at the same time ;-). > > I can't guarantee that on my own, but as I'll be re-writing most of the HOWTOs anyway, I could take point for a while. > Re-enabling the Wiki elsewhere may still be better than not having one > at all, but looks like a stop-gap measure to me. I don't have any > particular preference where such a Wiki could be hosted. > > So you'd really just want to get rid of the Wiki? > Most of the Wiki pages are already in Markdown syntax. The rest is a > mixture of HTML and Markdown, for no particular reason. The only page > which would be hard to do in Markdown is the "usage" page, because that > is a verbatim extract of the automatically generated README.html page. > > That's not an issue, Github's Pages infrastructure deals with mixed content just fine. > I can grant you an additional role so that you can edit (and thus view) > the source of each page. What's your username on syncevolution.org? > > It's 'ReichenHack', but if possible I'd prefer a database dump over/in addition to website access. Emile
_______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
