Guys, please calm down.
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 08:57 +0200, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > Alright, let me then call it as I see it. I don't remember Patrick > complaining, and that spectacular understanding of yours hasn't > translated into any action towards improved documentation, so I wonder > what exactly your beef is. I think Ove was honestly trying to help, and I think he did by doing a recap of the entire architecture, something that I had neglected to do. That he hasn't rewritten the documentation has many reasons, all of them perfectly okay. For example, he wrote and maintains the SyncEvolution ports for Maemo and the Jolla phone in his spare time, which is enough work already. > That you're interested in how communication works is in that context > pretty hilarious. I am only well-versed in formal communication - > between analytic philosophy and aspergers I know where my handicap > lies. But with your interest in mind, what did you envision to be the > reaction to your exasperated claim that this is taking an amazingly > long time to sink in? What did you intend to convey or achieve? I > don't see much positive in that particular piece of communication. It was just a neutral observation and an explanation why he chimed in. Please don't take it personally. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
