On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 14:18 -0700, Todd Wilson wrote: > Another suggestion I would like to make is that it can also make sense > to split up the manpage into more than one. For example, there could > be a syncevolution_config (5) manpage that lists and gives > explanations of all the configuration properties, so that the > syncevolution (1) manpage could just focus on the command-line > switches. The man pages of many other programs with substantial > configuration files are organized that way (ssh, sshd, openssl, > dhclient, ntp, smb, and others come to mind).
So you would split out the "CONFIGURATION PROPERTIES" section with the automatically generated config property descriptions? What about the description of the term "property"? If we move that into syncevolution_config, the syncevolution man page itself may become less comprehensible. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
