On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 21:34 +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> > wrote: > Without X, should I use D-Bus or not?
Yes. > if yes, how could I made them using it consistantly? If you disable the GNOME keyring usage, then you don't need D-Bus for the configure operations. > On the other hand, password=111 seems to be found, otherwise > the SyncML > client would not be allowed to connect. > > Does "syncevolution --print-config -q c102 addressbook" show > the actual > databasePassword or "-"? > > > It show the actual databasePassword, which is my goolgle password. So it already wasn't using GNOME keyring. > If that fails, you can work around it by disabling GNOME > keyring: > syncevolution --configure keyring=no > > it returns "[ERROR] No configuration name specified.", I guess it > should be > "syncevolution --configure keyring=no c102" instead? Right. Is the "c102 addressbook" source really usable? Let's debug that first. For that you can run, without D-Bus: SYNCEVOLUTION_DEBUG=1 syncevolution --daemon=no --print-items loglevel=4 c102 addressbook What's the complete output of syncevolution --daemon=no --print-config -q c102 addressbook Replace confidentials username/password details as needed... -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
