On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 01:48 +0200, Helge Kraak wrote: > Unfortunately I don't have the testserver set up anymore so that I > can't give more detailed debug information at the moment in case you > would maybe want to further investigate the syncevolution behavior.
It would have been nice to get confirmation that the 1.4.99.4 indeed works better with SabreDAV. It should, because I revised database discovery and error checking. But don't worry, if it doesn't, someone will find that out sooner or later. > I'd like to express my appreciation again for your kind assistance. You're welcome. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
