Le mardi 14 avril 2015 à 15:42 +0200, Patrick Ohly a écrit : > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 15:08 +0200, Daniel CLEMENT wrote: > > Le mardi 14 avril 2015 à 14:24 +0200, Patrick Ohly a écrit : > > > [...] > > > > > Also double-check that you are using the modified libsynthesis. > > > > > > > > 2) How can I ascertain this? I assumed it was enough to start > > > > syncevolution with the full path to the compiled version. > > > > > > You are right, libtool shell wrappers take care of that. However, other > > > files (like XML fragments) need to be installed unless additional env > > > variables get set as describe in the main README - I got a bit confused > > > here myself. Typically I develop with shared libs disabled. > > > > > > To verify, run > > > LD_DEBUG=files src/syncevolution --version --daemon=no 2>&1 | grep > > > libsynthesis > > > > I assume /usr/local/bin/syncevolution (there's no /src/syncevolution) > > There is, in your compile directory. It's a shell script with sets > LD_LIBRARY_PATH such that it uses the uninstalled shared libraries. > > I thought you were running without "make install". Once you do that, you > are on your own regarding LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Graham's suggestion should > work. > I'm glad to report success at last.
I could check that with the prefix that Graham suggested, the libsynthesis from /usr/local/ was used. Then, another test with a dummy calendar item ended in successful sync, without time offset (so I did not bother to inspect the log). (I used make install because my 1st idea was to use checkinstall, for building a package that I would have reused on my main PC. Then, out of habit, I fell back to make - install.) Thank you both for your support. If you want me to test further while I'm at it, just ask. Best regards, -- Daniel CLEMENT _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
