On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 08:50 +0200, deloptes wrote: > Patrick Ohly wrote: > >> The story about ITEM_NEEDS_MERGE however is still a bit unclear to me. Is > >> it a suggestion - at least I understand it as such? > > > > It's a bit more than a suggestion. It's a request to the engine to do > > the merge. What happens is: > > 1. add new item -> ITEM_NEEDS_MERGE without changing the database > > 2. read old item with luid as provided with ITEM_NEEDS_MERGE > > 3. update old item with merged data > > > > So in this case I should not DEL+ADD in the backend, but just notify with > ITEM_NEEDS_MERGE? Correct?
Correct. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
