On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 23:12 +0200, Tino Mettler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 15:22:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > One exception > > is perhaps Debian Stable, which only has an old version (1.4.99). But > > even that isn't too bad. > > Hi Patrick, > > I could check if a backport of 1.5.1 for Stable is trivial. Users > would have to manually add the backports repository, but installing > binaries from syncevolution.org requires some manual steps, too.
After fiddling with the build system I think I have Debian Jessie and Testing/Stretch covered. So thanks for the offer, but unless someone wants to have "official" Debian packages backported, there's no need. I'm still not sure what binaries and features users really need nowadays. While testing, I noticed that Akonadi has issues on Debian Stretch (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97609). To move forward with that, I would have to write a simpler reproducer, then file a bug against Debian and/or Akonadi. Tino, can you reproduce the same with the Debian packages (https://packages.debian.org/stretch/amd64/syncevolution-libs-kde/filelist)? It could be specific to my test environment (X11 provided by VNC only because Akonadi no longer runs headless, no KDE session). Is anyone still using SyncEvolution with Akonadi? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution