On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 17:44 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 26/10/16 17:10, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > I'll try that, thanks for the hint... yes, it helped. > > Good. > > > I'm now running into some new conversion issues for calendar data (time > > zone related). To be checked. > > I can't say I am surprised. The time zone stuff is fairly fragile -- I > seem to remember putting in some hacks to try to make the best of a bad > job. Make sure that the timezone of the syncevolution system is the > same as the timezone of the Outlook calendar that creates the events (I > seem to remember there are some cases where I had to make that > assumption, which is most likely true for most people).
After checking I came to the conclusion that the differences are harmless and merely come from slightly different names getting assigned to the daylight resp. standard component of the time zone. Perhaps Exchange 2016 and/or recent time zone definition changes caused that. I've updated the test cases to get clean test passes. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
