On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 12:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > - itime = icaltime_from_timet (now, 0); > + itime = icaltime_from_timet_with_zone (now, 0, > NULL);
Upstream replaced icaltime_from_timed(x, 0) with icaltime_from_timet_with_zone(x, 0, icaltimezone_get_utc_timezone()). Is that perhaps also what should be done in SyncEvolution? I haven't tested whether it makes a difference yet. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
