+1
Il giorno 10/mar/2012, alle ore 11.04, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto:

> +1.
> 
> Colm.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Denis Signoretto
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I agree and I like asf style.
>> 
>> I vote for it ;) !
>> 
>> Bye,
>> Denis.
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Messaggio originale-----
>>> Da: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Inviato: venerdì 9 marzo 2012 18.37
>>> A: [email protected]
>>> Oggetto: Version Numbering Scheme
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> upon Emmanuel suggestion, I am starting here this thread
>>> about Syncope
>>> version numbering scheme.
>>> 
>>> A quick google showed me an ASF reference for this topic [1].
>>> 
>>> Personally, I think that having Major.Minor.Micro scheme
>>> could be a wise
>>> thing (so far we have been using Major.Minor with Micro == 0 and
>>> Major.Minor.Micro with Micro > 0- take [2] as reference).
>>> 
>>> I think that [1] could be good also for the milestone / release
>>> candidate (that we used sometimes in the past [2]) approach.
>>> 
>>> WDYT?
>>> 
>>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/DIRxPMGT/version-numbering-scheme.html
>>> [2] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/syncope/syncope/
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>> 
>>> Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
> 
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to