On 27/07/2012 10:34, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,

comments inline

Le 7/27/12 10:10 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
Hi all,
it's time for a new report to IPMC.
In the following I've drafted ours: please add / correct / remove / comment as needed.

Regards.


Syncope is an Open Source system for managing digital identities in enterprise environments, implemented in JEE technology. Syncope joined the incubator on February 10th 2012.

Community Development:

The transition of previous users-base to the new ASF infrastructure was successfully completed. user@ ML activity is raising, with new users evaluating the project and asking questions: currently 35 subscribers, including 4 archive / non human address.

Two contributors were voted and reported in project site's team list page.
  One of such was also voted as committer and PPMC member but declined.
Does that mean that only one committer has been added ? Or that 3 people have been voted in and one has declined the invitation ?

Ok, rephrase.

Two contributors were voted and reported in project site's team list page.
The PPMC voted a new committer and PPMC member; this candidate declined our invitation.

dev@ ML activity is quite consistent: currently 35 subscribers, including 4 archive / non human address.

Project Development:

  Commits activity is healthy, commits@ ML activity is high.

Three releases, carried out by two distinct release managers, have been successfully completed; the release process has been included in project website in order to facilitate new release managers.
  The path to 1.0.0-incubating seems to be really short now.

Web Site/Communication Development:

  The website is kept up-to-date on http://incubator.apache.org/syncope/
Status page http://incubator.apache.org/projects/syncope.html is updated.
  It introduces Syncope, provides first content and news.
Is the web site Confluence-based ? Would you consider switching to the Apache CMS system?

The website (http://incubator.apache.org/syncope/) is based on maven site generation from source tree + svnpubsub.
I think we are pretty satisfied with this and wouldn't like to change.
Anyway, does this matter in the report?

Regards.

--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

ASF Member, Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

Reply via email to