Hi!
I agree with Ivan and Konstantin here. Compile time maybe a question to
consider when you're adding new classes and in that case create the static
libraries would be needed again. Apart of that, it would need someone to
maintain those libraries what is one more task to do.
Carlos
El sábado, 12 de octubre de 2013, Ivan Mahonin escribió:
> Hello.
>
> I think we need to move ETL into synfig-core package. And keep it in
> headers (not lib) in this case GCC may compile ETL functions inline.
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most
> from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Synfig-devl mailing list
> [email protected] <javascript:;>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
>
--
Carlos
http://synfig.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Synfig-devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
