Hello,
has this bug is very annoying and very bad regression, i have take a look to
it.
After some tests (see comment in
http://www.synfig.org/issues/thebuggenie/synfig/issues/516) i have found the
proper way to fix it :
in synfig-studio/src/gui/trees/layertreestore.cpp
void
LayerTreeStore::get_value_vfunc (const Gtk::TreeModel::iterator& iter, int
column, Glib::ValueBase& value)const
{
[....]
etl::handle<Layer_PasteCanvas> paste=
etl::handle<Layer_PasteCanvas>::cast_dynamic(
layer->get_parent_paste_canvas_layer() );
if(paste)
{
etl::handle<synfig::Canvas>
sub_canvas=paste->get_param("canvas").get(sub_canvas);
if(sub_canvas && !sub_canvas->is_inline())
{
Gtk::TreeRow row=*iter;
if (*row.parent()) // <----------- here is the fix !
{
paste = etl::handle<Layer_PasteCanvas>::cast_dynamic(
Layer::Handle((*row.parent())[model.layer]) );
}
}
}
if(paste)
{
[....]
}
but stilll, i need help from someone to explain me a point : what for this
piece of code is useful ?
because seems that just commenting this part (has i did in comment#4 ) it is
also functional.
(any way, testing null pointer is far way cleaner than comment/remove another
work ;-)
my best things for you guys.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Synfig-devl mailing list
Synfig-devl@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
