Hmm...I hadn't tried that before, but it does work if I also delete the interface route i.e. route delete 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.1.2. However, I don't know how to make this latter change persistent across reboots since it's an automatic route definition as a result of an interface.
Another option is to leave the interface route in place, but: route add 192.168.2.0/25 192.168.1.1 route add 192.168.2.128/25 192.168.1.1 is able to achieve the effect I want since smaller subnets are prioritized in the routing table. But does anyone know of a cleaner way to do achieve this goal? This feels hacky, even if it does work. I guess I could add an rc script to remove the interface route using the first method, but that feels even hackier than adding two /25 routes. TIA, William Yang > -----Original Message----- > From: sysadmin-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:sysadmin-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Gopi Desaboyina > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 12:04 PM > To: sysadmin-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [sysadmin-discuss] routing question > > Did you give try with static route ? I think by default it might ignore > routes if it have network is reachable through any of the interface. > > netstat -nr > route add 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.1 > netstat -nr # any diff here with above o/p ? > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > sysadmin-discuss mailing list > sysadmin-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sysadmin-discuss _______________________________________________ sysadmin-discuss mailing list sysadmin-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sysadmin-discuss
