On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Richard L. Hamilton <rlha...@smart.net> wrote:
> [...]
>> > To get around the problem
>> > pmap: cannot examine 5608: address space is
>> changing
>> >
>> > and get a closer look, try stopping the process
>> first:
>> >
>> > pstop 5608
>> >
>> > and then running pmap or whatever to inspect it,
>> and finally running
>> >
>> > prun 5608
>> >
>> > to let it run again.
>>
>> Why is pmap not doing this?
>
> I don't know.  I (a) don't work for Sun, and (b) only run
> OpenSolaris under VirtualBox on an Intel Mac Mini (my other
> systems are SPARC and running Solaris 9, and Solaris SXCE snv_97,
> respectively).  So just starting OpenSolaris under VirtualBox uses
> about all the time I'm willing to spend getting my answer right
> on anything but the most interesting problems.  I would _guess_ that
> either using the -F option might also help
>
>     -F                  Force. Grabs the target process even  if
>                         another process has control.

-F has no effect.

>> We're still verifying the output because the script
>> finished in four
>> hours while the legacy perl version of the script
>> used to run a whole
>> weekend.
>> This is suspicious and too good to be true.

We are done with the verification of the data and did not find any
problems so far.

> Maybe, maybe not.  If the rewrite also improved the algorithm
> or implementation, that's entirely possible.  Also, a lot of perl
> scripts run more external programs than they really ought to.
> Recent ksh93 has a lot of built-in commands that used to require
> running external programs.

Is there any documentation about this feature?

> So for any of various reasons, such
> an improvement, although suspicious, doesn't seem at all impossible
> to me. (It also leaves me thinking that perhaps with enough effort,
> further improvements might be possible.)

OK. We'll have a look.

Yves
_______________________________________________
sysadmin-discuss mailing list
sysadmin-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sysadmin-discuss

Reply via email to