> On 11/3/2017 8:21 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote:
>> we only
>> have the 'random removal' issue left. But I am confident the
>> merge-scoresets fix will take care of that.
> I don't know the random removal issue you are referring to. Can you
> detail it more?  Perhaps in bugzilla?

David Jones has the details and I believe its one of the next things on
his list. I just mentioned it here so people do not get the idea all is
good now.

>
> NOTE: we can do things with bugzilla if we want to have sysadmins or
> something like that listed as a component or whatever.

That would probably be a good idea. Actually I was suprised the whole
update issue was not in bugzilla yet. It makes it much easier to work with
multiple people on the same issue.

>
>>
>>> Now, the interesting thing is does changing the system to en_US fix the
>>> issue if we revert my change to that rule?
>> No need to revert the change. You can just test this by hand by running
>> the grep command on the old 72_active.cf from one of the tgz files (from
>> shell).
>
> Can you document the replication steps at
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7497

Sure, I just saw the ticket being created, good idea.

>
> I was speaking more to the fact that I'd like to add the multilanguage
> descriptions back.  I documented it in bugzilla especially if someone
> else commits a rule with similar.

Yeah it would be good if the update system was resistant to this kind of
seemingly innocent changes.

>
> Regards,
>
> KAM
>
>


Reply via email to