I like having a dozen or so and there is really zero security issue since the rules are crytographically signed.
I would definitely open a bug if that retry doesn't work. I didn't know that. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:13 PM Henrik K <h...@hege.li> wrote: > > The embarassing truth is that mirror retry doesn't work in 3.4.2. So any > of > the mirrors not working might delay updates for some people by a day or > so. > Atleast I cron once a night.. > > I always wondered if we actually need this many mirrors? 10(!!) is quite a > lot. Anyone can easily churn 5 TB of data with 5 eur/month kimsufi server > or similar, but it would seem more practical maintenance wise to have only > few very well maintained ones (and I mean this also security wise). > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:00:23PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Should we do that when just 1 of their sub-A records is down? > > -- > > Kevin A. McGrail > > Member, Apache Software Foundation > > Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:59 AM Bill Cole < > > sa-bugz-20080...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote: > > > > > I've commented out sa-update.verein-clean.net in > > > /site/updates/MIRRORED.BY to quiet the notices. > > > > > > Tobi: Please inform sysadmins@spamassassin.apache.org when/if > > > 148.251.212.58 is working or no longer in DNS for > > > sa-update.verein-clean.net > > > > > > > > > On 12 Jun 2019, at 11:18, root wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > http://sa-update.verein-clean.net/ (148.251.212.58): DOWN > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > -- > > > Bill Cole > > > b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org > > > (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) > > > Not Currently Available For Hire > > > >
